Video Message

SEARCH:
Advanced Search      
Media Coverage
Appellate Essays
SCV Opinion & Analysis
CAV Opinion & Analysis
4th Cir. Opinion & Analysis
Appellate Updates
L.Steven Emmert
Virginia Appellate News & Analysis by L. Steven Emmert - Inside the Case Decisions, RUlings & Opinions
Benignita
L. STEVEN EMMERT
back to 4th Cir. Opinion & Analysis
   

4th Cir. Opinion & Analysis

DIVIDED EN BANC FOURTH CIRCUIT REFUSES HABEAS CLAIM BASED ON MENTAL RETARDATION

On Thursday, March 9, a sharply divided Fourth Circuit issues an en banc decision affirming the denial of a habeas corpus petition filed on behalf of a man who claimed to have been mentally retarded.  Thursday's decision is in Walton v. Johnson, Director.  The decision rejects the petitioner's claim based on the US Supreme Court's recent ruling in Atkins v. Virginia , in which the execution of mentally retarded defendants was ruled unconstitutional.

The decision is split as finely as possible on the court; seven judges form the majority, authored by Judge Shedd, while a dissent, led by Chief Judge Wilkins, includes six signatures. 

 
         
Virginia Appellate News & Analysis © 2007