SUPREME COURT SEEKS COMMENT ON RECIPROCITY PROCEDURES
[Posted April 24, 2013] The Supreme Court is proposing to change the procedures for admission of attorneys from other jurisdictions. The proposal, which may be accessed here, makes a few changes to existing practice while retaining much of the existing framework. Here are some of the notable changes to Rule 1A:1:
Currently, an applicant must furnish a certificate of good standing from the presiding judge of the court of last resort where hes currently licensed. The new rule would liberalize that slightly, permitting certification by other proper official, presumably including individuals such as a Supreme Court Clerk.
The new rule would eliminate the existing five-year-minimum rule for practice. Instead, an attorney must establish that he has been practicing for three of the last five years. The Board of Bar Examiners still must find that the applicant has made such progress in the practice of law that it would be unreasonable to require the applicant to take an examination. In other words, you don’t get an automatic ticket, now or under the new rule.
Theres a new requirement to complete twelve hours of Virginia MCLE programs before reciprocity admission will be granted.
Now for a big one: The current rule requires a new lawyer to certify that he intends to practice full-time as a member of the Virginia State Bar. This means that if a foreign lawyer wants to obtain a Virginia license but still maintain a primary office elsewhere, hes out of luck; his only option is to take the Virginia Bar Exam, even if hes been practicing for thirty years and is one of the deans of his states bar. The new rule simply drops this requirement with no fanfare.
If the applicants foreign license is subject to a restriction, the Board of Bar Examiners will be, under the proposed rule, directed to consider whether the applicants fitness to practice in
Finally, the full-time-Virginia-practice language in Rule 1A:3 would be removed under the new rule.
100 North 9th Street